Everyone Stumbles

I have blogged before on the subject of none of us being perfect, but I was reminded today that everyone stumbles occasionally. I think that’s interesting, because I have been listening to Natalie Grant’s song, “I Will Not Be Moved.” The chorus of that song says, “I will stumble, I will fall down / But I will not be moved. / I will make mistakes / I will face heartache / But I will not be moved. / On Christ the solid rock I stand / All other ground is sinking sand / I will not be moved.”

Proverbs 24:16 tells us that a righteous man falls seven times, and gets back up, but a foolish man only falls once. Well, okay, I’m paraphrasing somewhat, but the idea is that it isn’t about how many times you fall, it’s about how many times you get back up. When you stop getting back up, that’s when you have a problem.

Of course, part of the process is repentance. Some people think that repentance is simply asking for forgiveness. It’s not. Repentance is like a U-turn: Having come to the realization that one is headed down the wrong road, one turns around and gets back on the right road. Should God forgive someone who isn’t sorry for what they did? If one were sorry for what one has done, wouldn’t one take steps to ensure that it doesn’t happen again? Don’t misunderstand me; I realize that many people make the same mistakes over and over again (been there, done that).

Let’s suppose for a moment that the sin that we are talking about is drunkenness. Our hero (and you won’t often hear me refer to a drunk as a hero) realizes that he has a problem, so he gets rid of all the booze in his house. That’s a good start, but he continues to hang out at bars with his buddies. Most nights, it doesn’t take very long before he doesn’t feel very sociable drinking ginger ale, especially after the third or fourth glass. After several months, he comes to the realization that, although he has “repented” of his drunkenness, he is still getting hammered three or four nights a week. He may feel completely justified in saying that he has repented, but, let’s face it, he hasn’t changed very much. What he hasn’t come to understand, yet, is that the time for him to decide whether or not to have a drink is before he steps into the bar. It’s pretty much inevitable that, if he goes in, he’s going to eventually talk himself into having “just one.” It’s equally inevitable that the one drink will talk him into a second one, and so on.

Now, you may think that I’m down on alcohol. I used drunkenness as an example because I think that we can easily see that progression. Maybe your problem is pornography, and you need to get the internet out of your house, and make sure you aren’t going anywhere that might expose you to your vice. Maybe your problem is soap operas, and you need to get rid of your TV, and arrange your beauty shop appointments later in the day (and, no, I don’t think all soap opera addicts are women, or that all women who are soap opera addicts go to beauty shops; I’m just saying). There’s a scene in “Jungle Fever” where Wesley Snipes’ character, an architect, objects to being assigned a white secretary. His bosses are a little surprised at this show of bigotry, and remind him that they can’t hire and fire based on color, only on qualifications—they would get in hot water with the EEOC. As the movie progresses, though, we find out that it isn’t a problem of bigotry: Snipes’ character knows that he has a weakness for women that are not his color, and he is trying to protect himself and his marriage. That was a show of wisdom on his part, and maybe, if he had been more open with his bosses about why he felt he needed a secretary of color, they might have been able to work something out, or at least made sure that he never wound up working late with her and nobody else around.

My point is, everybody makes mistakes. God forgives mistakes. God can even forgive the same mistake a number of different times. If one makes a mistake and realizes that this circumstance represents a weakness in one’s own spiritual armor, then one needs to take steps to protect oneself in the future. That is part of repentance. On the other hand, if one finds oneself making the same mistake over and over and don’t feel that it indicates a personal weakness, then one might want to consider the possibility that one is related to Cleopatra, because she was the Queen of Denial.

Nobody's Perfect

Some have posed the question, “Why would God use people like ______ to do His work?” Fill in the blank with just about any character in the Bible you would like. For example, Abraham, father and patriarch of all of Israel, the man to whom the Promise was given, tried to pass off Sarah as his sister once because he was afraid that he would be killed by a man or men that wanted Sarah for themselves. Of course, the man that he feared most was indeed attracted to Sarah, but, since he believed that Abraham and Sarah were brother and sister, he just took her. It turns out that he wasn’t the kind of guy that would have killed a man just to take his wife, anyway, but even if he had been, shouldn’t Abraham have trusted God to protect him? Of course he should have. So, basically what we have learned about Abraham is that he suffered from cowardice. So why would God use someone like Abraham?

If that were not bad enough, apparently Abraham was so ashamed of himself for his actions that he didn’t tell Isaac about it. Many years later, Isaac and Rebekah were in the same city, Gerar, under the same king, Abimelech, and Isaac told the same lie for the same reason. So why would God use someone like Isaac?

When David was king over all of Israel, he found himself attracted to a woman that was one of his neighbors, in fact, she was the wife of one of David’s mighty men. He had her brought into his home, and later had her husband killed, so that he could marry her. Why would God use someone like David?

Peter denied the Lord three times, after promising Jesus that he would follow Him into death if it came to that. I can somewhat understand that Peter’s world had just been rocked; he followed Jesus for three years, and, even though Jesus tried to warn him what was coming, Peter was not ready for the arrest. While he was trying to figure it out, to reconcile what he thought he had known with what had just happened, some people started talking to him about being one of Jesus’ disciples. Why would God use someone like Peter?
To be honest, we could go down the list of all the people in the Bible, and they all have faults, except for Jesus Himself. Some of them were fortunate enough to not have their faults actually mentioned in the Scriptures, but every one of them had faults. Paul even talked about his thorn in the flesh; how he sought God to remove it, but God finally told him that he needed the thorn to keep him from being exalted above measure (in other words, God didn’t want Paul to get a big head).

So why is it, that all through the Bible, God used imperfect people to carry out His perfect will? Let me ask you a question: What other kind of people would He have used? The Bible tells us that all have sinned, and all have come short of the glory of God. Let me ask you another question: If God hadn’t been able to use imperfect people all through the Bible, then how would He ever manage to be able to use you? Or, for that matter, how could I believe that God could ever use me? To be honest, I still struggle with that concept. But, if you and I wait for someone perfect to come along and do the work of God, we are going to have a long wait. He has already been here, and He has left it up to us, now. We just need to open up and let Him work through us.

What's the Use?

There are two types of gun owners in this country: those that got their guns legally, and those that did not. We know that we have a problem; guns keep getting used in robberies, or random shootings, or other crimes. We keep passing new and more restrictive gun-control laws, and the problem seems to be getting worse, instead of better. Why is that? Well, let's stop to consider: gun control laws may make accidental shootings less frequent, and they make crimes of opportunity or crimes of passion less frequent, someone who intends to use a gun to commit a crime probably isn't going to have much compunction about committing a crime in order to obtain a gun. At the same time, when gun-control laws are restrictive, a law-abiding citizen is considerably less likely to have a gun with which to defend him/herself. Statistically, one is much more likely to be victim of a violent crime in an area where gun-control laws are most restrictive, but we have to do something. The good thing about gun-control laws is that they do reduce accidental shootings, and they reduce gun theft (it's hard to steal a gun from somebody who doesn't have one). Unfortunately, the rate of other crimes goes up, and more than make up for the gains provided by those laws. So what do we do? The intelligent thing would be to sit down, do some careful research and figure out what we could do that would actually be effective, and if there are ways to better enforce the laws that we already have. Unfortunately, politics being what it is, any politician that actually tries to study the problem, gets accused of dragging his feat--kowtowing to the gun lobby, so our gun-control laws tend to be a series of band-aid solutions, resulting from knee-jerk reactions to real problems that Joe Taxpayer (understandably) wants the government to deal with. This results in a great deal of frustration for the law-abiding citizen in a high-crime area who just wants to protect his family.
Sometimes we, as Christians, become frustrated with ourselves. We set out, each day, to live the life that God would have us to live, and most days (if not every day), we find ourselves falling so far short of the potential that we have in God. That can be so depressing. Sometimes we just want to throw up our hands and quit. "What's the use?" we say, "I'm never going to get this right." And yet, we know that God has promised. He didn't promise to make us perfect, He promised that His Grace is sufficient. In First Thessalonians 4, Apostle Paul uses the phrase "we which are alive and remain." I've noticed that most people seem to think that he meant, "we which are alive and remain alive," but that would be redundant. It's redundant enough that he used the phrase twice (in verse 15 and verse 17); I submit that he meant, "we which are alive and remain faithful, which remain trying, which remain striving for the Kingdom..." What's the use? If we continue in His Word, we shall be given a crown of Glory that fadeth not away...
It just doesn't get any better than that.