Tuesday, March 18, 2008
What Did Jesus Look Like?
I’m just glad that it’s not a corn flake that looks like Jesus or Mother Mary. Pardon me if I sound cynical, but I get tired of people seeing a face or an image in a stain or something, and they are just convinced that they are seeing Jesus’ face (or His mother’s). Can I ask a question? How do you know what Jesus looked like? There weren’t any cameras then. The only paintings that we have were painted many generations later. The Bible never really describes Jesus’ appearance, except to say that He was not a handsome man (that, in and of itself, proves that every painting or image I have ever seen of Jesus is somewhat less than accurate).
The traditional image of Jesus shows Him with light-brown hair and blue eyes, neither attribute was common in the area at the time. I don’t think that Jesus came to Israel looking like an outsider. He would have had dark hair and eyes, and a somewhat dark complection, as well. I don’t mean dark as in He looked African, I mean dark as in Middle-Eastern.
To some extent, that’s speculation, but I think it has a logical basis. Generally the paintings that have been done of Jesus are based simply on the artist’s aesthetics. Well, I think Jesus looked like because that’s what I think looks good. Except Jesus isn’t supposed to look good… Traditionally, Jesus has been painted to look like the same ethic group as the artist. In more recent years, Jesus has been painted as a white man by artists of color simply because that’s the image of Jesus that they had been taught. Voltaire was right about the way we see God: “If God created us in his own image, we have more than reciprocated.”
I had one young man tell me once that he knew Jesus was black, because the Bible said He had hair like wool, and you don’t see white people with kinky hair. There are two basic problems with that: 1) it doesn’t say that Jesus hair was kinky like wool, it says Jesus’ hair was white like wool (is that where the idea of a blonde Jesus came from? I don't think it means that He was blonde, either), and, 2) many Middle-Easterners (and, truthfully, even some white people—it’s just not nearly as common) have kinky hair. I can’t argue that Jesus was white, I’m quite certain that he wasn’t. I do think that part of the reason that Jesus’ ethnicity isn’t expressly mentioned in Scripture is that God didn’t want us to feel that Jesus was only sent to one ethnic group. For God so loved the world, remember? We sing the song, “Red, brown, yellow, black, and white / They are precious in His sight; / Jesus loves the little children of the world.” We are all God’s children, no matter how different we may seem.
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
Trust
We are taught in the Scriptures that God is our Father. This can be problematic, at least for some people, because human fathers are, well, human. To compare God to a human father risks attributing fault to God. Even our own natural fathers are human and prone to failure; but the relationship we are supposed to have with them is similar to the relationship we should have with God. We as human beings have a bad tendency to attribute human qualities to non-humans. Sometimes we even humanize objects (that's easy to do with computers, but sometimes we even blame a piece of furniture for being in the way as if it had moved itself from where we left it--sometimes we even assign it a motive for moving...). Someone asked the question, "Why does a mirror reverse left and right and not up and down?" Let's do a thought experiment: Suppose that you are lying on your left side, facing a mirror; now left is down, and right is up. Move your right arm (your 'up' arm). Now, does your reflections 'up' arm move, or does its 'down' arm move? (If you have a hard time imagining this, try it and see how it comes out.) The 'up' arm, of course, because mirrors don't reverse up and down. Now, consider for a moment, isn't the arm that moved on your right (remember, right is up)? The problem isn't that mirrors reverse left and right, it's that we expect them to reverse left and right (the reflection looks like another person, and that other person's right should be to our left, but it isn't) and they don't reverse anything. This is just us, humanizing our own reflections.
We should not attribute human qualities to God, however. Aren't we created in God's image? Yes, in the sense that we are immortal souls, but, unlike God, we have mortal flesh that doesn't always agree with what is best for our souls. Voltaire once commented that, "If God created us in His own image, we have more than reciprocated." There is a certain logic to the idea that if God created us in His own image, then God must look like us, yet, most of what we think of as our defining characteristics aren't common to all of humanity. Some of are fair-complected, others are dark complected, many others are somewhere in-between; so what color is God? Again, God is a Spirit, He is not flesh and blood. We can, and should, trust God, because He is not a man, that He should lie; He is not a man that He should repent (or have anything to repent of, except for creating us). Don't misunderstand me, I know that there are times when God has changed His mind (usually because of something than one or more of us human beings has done), but as far as Him having done something evil and having to repent of that, no, that's never happened.



