In the gospels, Jesus did a lot of teaching in parables. This was a way to get a point across by relating to people, talking about things that they already knew, but relating that to something that they didn't. One of the things that I have heard people say about parables is that, since they don't represent things that actually happened, they aren't actual doctrine; you can ignore them with impunity. That position doesn't make sense to me. Jesus, God manifest in the flesh (1 Tim 3:16), was teaching His followers through parables (Mark 4:2). Now He was able to create characters and situations to convey an idea. If anything, we should probably pay more attention to the parables than to all the stories in the Bible (not to suggest that it would be okay to ignore the stories, it wouldn't be).
In Luke 14:15-24, Jesus taught something which has become known as, 'The Parable of the Great Supper." In this story, a man planned a great supper, but his chosen guests started making excuses, so he sent his servants to look for other people to eat this dinner, so that, at least the food wouldn't go to waste. They went out and just found anybody they could, even carrying in crippled people to partake of the feast. Now, the obvious interpretation of this parable is that, since the Jews rejected Jesus as their Messiah, God opened the door to the Goyim, the Gentiles, to attain salvation. Some people have gone as far as to say that we are the new chosen people. I don't think that's the case; I think the parable is somewhat broader than that. Keep in mind that Apostle Paul wrote, in Romans 11, that we Gentiles have no right to boast against the Jews, because, just as Paul himself, being a Jew, had rejected Jesus but had repented and been saved, so too, other Jews could be brought to the knowledge of Christ. They were taken out because of unbelief, but, if they, God's first choice, were to accept Jesus as their Messiah, they would be saved. Perhaps Antisemitism has some of it's roots in jealousy--they were God's preference, and, even now, God would prefer them over us. Of course, the other excuse is that 'they killed our Lord and Saviour...' Please. Get over it. It was His plan to die for our sins in the first place. In any case, back to the parable, anybody that rejects Jesus, misses out on the reward--be they Jew or Gentile. Fortunately for us, anybody can repent, and get back in God's grace--be they Jew or Gentile. Remember Romans 1:16?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
But you didn't tell the rest of the story! When the host same in and found that those who had been pulled in were not dressed properly, he had then cast out. This parable has always worried me and in discssing it with some clergy, I found that they were not comfortable with it and it had been discussed school and nosatisfactory sulution was found.
C,
Different story. You're referring to the Parable of the Wedding Feast in Matthew 22, which, in all honesty, probably is the same story, but Matthew recorded it differently than Luke did. The parable does seem more than harsh, unless, when one financed a wedding, one also supplied wedding garments. It would be pretty presumptuous to ask somebody to drop everything to come to a wedding (without an advance invitation), and then get upset that he wasn't dressed properly--unless you rented a tux for him, and he just refused to put it on. Clearly, in this parable, the wedding garments correspond to the white robes in Rev. 6:11, which were given to those who obeyed God in this life. That would make the people thrown out of the wedding feast the same people referred to in Romans 10:3.
But read Luke 14 and Matthew 22 and you'll see why I didn't include 'the rest of the story.'
Post a Comment