Showing posts with label immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label immigration. Show all posts

Monday, August 20, 2007

Inflation

Looks like the federal government has increased the minimum wage. Know what that means? More money in my pocket. At least for now. Inflation will, of course, pick up the slack, and, in a month or so, it will mean less money in my pocket. Actually, I haven't worked for minimum wage in an awfully long time. This won't affect my paycheck until after my employers look at the inflation caused by raising the minimum wage and decide to increase my pay accordingly.
I find it somewhat humorous that the Washington Post quotes a Raleigh, NC waitress as applauding the increase, and criticising the Republican Party for blocking the increase for so long. Why is that humorous? Two reasons: First, as a food service worker who gets tips presumably based on her performance (I say presumably because some people feel obligated to leave a tip whether they were satisfied with their service or not, while other people don't leave a tip at all, no matter how good the service was), her minimum wage is considerably less than the rest of us. The federally mandated minimum wage for tipped employees is $2.13 per hour. Second, because the state of North Carolina already has a higher minimum wage legislated at the state level than the federal government's new minimum anyway (a tipped employee in the state of North Carolina is entitled to at least $2.43 per hour).
The bottom line is, people who are at or near minimum wage always look at it as a good thing when the minimum wage goes up, and, in all fairness, for them it is, at least in the short term. What they don't see is that, in the long term, since people making low wages just got a government mandated pay raise across the board, the costs of doing business also go up. Do you really think that large corporations are going to take a big chunk of their profits and give it to the people who stack boxes or clean the toilets? No, of course not; they're going to raise prices to make up for the extra money that they now must give to their lower tier workers. Do you really think that anything you buy doesn't have some minimum wage employees in the chain of delivery somewhere? So as wages go up, prices go up, which means that inflation has wiped out whatever extra money you just earned.
I do understand: Having the minimum wage increased feels like a raise, especially if you're actually working for minimum wage. Having extra money in your pocket makes you feel better, until you get to the store and find out that you can't buy any more than you could before. Then you want another raise...
To some extent, that's common to us all: I often wish that I was making enough money to support myself in the manner in which I would like to become accustomed, but whenever I get a raise, my lifestyle desires suddenly become more expensive. Trying to make up the difference by earning more money just makes you want more things. We, as a people need to learn to live with less than what we want, or maybe just train ourselves to want less. Something like that.
In other news, the quote of the week: "Everyone should be angry." I know I'm angry. It amazes me that some people think that they are, or the church is, exempt from the laws of this country. There are times when the law of God supersedes the laws of man, but this is not one of those times. "Oh, she shouldn't have to be separated from her son." Nobody's telling her that she should be separated from her son (that would be child abandonment, wouldn't it?). She should take her son with her, and then use her son's citizenship to try to get a visa to come to the United States legally. I understand that Jesus commanded us to be good neighbors, and we should be. Surely one of the many kind people that she has interacted with during her illegal stay would have enough compassion to be willing to sponsor her for a visa. That would be a neighborly thing to do--helping her break the law is not.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Animals and Immigration

Several animal stories in the news today: A Joey (baby kangaroo), a panda, a snake, a serval (wildcat), and a monkey. It seems odd to me that so many animals hit the news on the same day.
The town where I live voted on a proposition to have local law enforcement apply to be given special federal deportation authority. Some people are very upset about it, some think it's overdue. New Haven, Connecticut has decided to go the other way, citing public safety as a concern. I can somewhat understand that. Just because a person is in this country illegally, doesn't mean that they should be taken advantage of--enslaved or robbed, with the knowledge and the understanding that these people won't go to the police under fear of deportation. This is a valid concern. I still think that the police have a responsibility to enforce existing laws--including immigration laws. I don't think that enforcing immigration laws should be the number one priority of any local law enforcement agency--violent crime should be. If the victim of a violent crime should happen to be an illegal alien, then the police officer should make every effort to arrest both parties, but it would be somewhat understandable if the victim 'got away,' although that may make it difficult to prosecute the violent offender without the victim to testify against him. In other words, illegal immigrants are criminals, just by virtue of being here illegally, but, the criminals that victimize them need to be taken care of. Even if you care nothing about the immigrants (and you should care about them, they are still people), keep in mind that murderers and muggers will find somebody else to prey on if the illegal aliens are deported.
Some of the objections raised to using local law enforcement supplement ICE is that our local police have been accused of racial profiling in the past, and this may simply give them another tool to harass Latinos. I hope that is not the case, but, to be honest, it seems to me that some of our police have shown some bias against Latinos. From what I understand, the town's position is that if someone is accused of a felony, and there is reason to suspect that they are here illegally, then their status will be checked, and, if it is deemed appropriate, then they will be deported. The Mayor has promised that we are not going to check status of traffic violators. I would assume that to mean that people reporting crimes are not in danger of being deported either.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Commenting on the News

Just a few comments on recent news:

Isn't your porn star name supposed to be your pet's name and the name of the street you grew up on? (If I find out somebody's making porn flicks using the name, Tigger Keswick, can I sue them?)

Where's the beef? Who cut the cheese?

So, in Utah, a brown lawn is a crime, but in Georgia, a green lawn is a crime?

You know, there are some things I don't want in my mouth--even if it is a lollypop...

Now, if only we could convince our government that Karaoke bars were a threat to security.

I've been using the wrong public restrooms. In the wrong country.

When do we get the three shells?

D'oh! I missed this movie when I blogged about movies the other day.

When do we get the three shells?

Somebody's seen 'Jurassic Park' too many times...

Does this mean we're going to stop fixing the blame and start fixing the problem?

Speaking of problems...